31 May 2006

An open letter to a dear friend.

My dear friend Gigs,

Your wedding day is approaching with remarkable speed and I want you to know how happy I am for you. I am thrilled you found someone who makes you happy and loves you and your little man. You are entering a ready-made family with joy, optimism, and the desire to love everyone to your heart’s fullest extent. You will be an excellent wife, mother, and stepmother as displayed through your creativity and huge heart. I have complete faith that your love for your family will be unconditional just as it has been with me.

In the past, I’ve said I would go nuts trying to plan a wedding as extensive as yours and if I ever marry I want a simple, elegant wedding. However, this is not a put down or a rebuke. It is only an example of our differences. I admire your tenacity to plan and arrange the wedding of your dreams. I watch you with admiration while you plan the greatest day of your life with enthusiasm and determination. Yes, shoot me if it takes me longer than nine months to plan my wedding, if I marry, because any longer than that would drive this chica and everyone around me insane. BUT I am thrilled you are finally able to have the wedding of your dreams – minus the beach – with a wonderful man who loves you. You are demonstrating a level of creativity and passion that is uniquely yours while planning your wedding that will make a special mark on the best day of your life. Your eye for detail and the love you are putting into planning the rest of your life will be the hallmarks of your married life.

The only bit of advice I have is stay close to our Lord through prayer and communal worship. Jesus Christ will help the love you have for your husband and family grow stronger each day while giving you strength during the storms you will face. Keep your eyes on Christ so he can guide every step you take and help your love for Him grow deeper.

Love is always patient and kind; love is never jealous; love is not boastful or conceited, it is never rude and never seeks its own advantage, it does not take offence or store up grievances. Love does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but finds its joy in the truth. It is always ready to make allowances, to trust, to hope and to endure whatever comes. Love never comes to an end. As it is, these remain: faith, hope and love, the three of them; and the greatest of them is love. 1 Corinthians 13: 4 – 8A, 13

26 May 2006

Wonderful Exhortation

Priests, the Pope said, cannot be experts on social and economic issues. Rather the Church seeks "priests who are mature, virile, capable of cultivating an authentic spiritual paternity."

The Holy Father encouraged priests to spend time developing their own spiritual resources, and to realized that time is never wasted when it is "dedicated to Christ in silent prayer," especially before the Blessed Sacrament. He observed that during the Communist era, some priests may have developed an unconscious tendency to hide their piety, in order to avoid public charges of hypocrisy. He urged the priests to be confident in their identity. "Trust in the power of the priesthood!" he exhorted them. Source


Hopefully a few American priests will hear this and take it to heart.

What is the problem with the following statement?

"This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered." Source

I would think the purpose of scientific study is to study carefully and critically with an open mind although many seem to disagree with me when evolution is deemed a theory not fact. I do not have a problem with evolution being taught in the schools as a THEORY provided the complete truth is taught - including the pit falls of evolution. There are major problems with the evolutionary theory which is why it remains a theory and not fact.

I do not believe we evolved in the manner put forward by Darwin and the current evolutionary theory although I do support a form of 'survival of the fittest' evolution which explains adaptation to new environments. For me, understanding exactly how I came into being is not the end all, be all of my faith, because I believe that is part of the wonderful knowledge we will obtain when we move onto life immortal. Yes, I believe God created me and that my existence is not an accident. For me, the very existence of my soul is incompatible with the theory of evolution. Scripture states plainly God created us in his likeness and knew us even before we were born. Does this mean I accept the Genesis story of creation as absolute fact? Absolutely not! I believe it is a story, maybe a myth like story to convey the mysticism of being created in God’s likeness by He who loves us with love unfailing and our fall from perfection. Putting my faith aside, there are scientific problems that exist with the theory of evolution that even hard core atheists identify. One day I will go into more detail regarding my scientific issues with evolution, the current standards used when teaching evolution and the impact this has on my faith.

Does my belief in a God driven creation mean my faith would be shattered if we found life in outerspace? Absolutely not! In fact, I would not be surprised, because I truly believe that anything is possible in God's hands. This type of finding would probably strengthen my belief in God and Jesus Christ. Does this mean I support creationism being taught in the schools? Here I begin to hedge answer carefully, because I do not know enough about creationism to form a full answer. I believe anything taught in science class should be backed by scientific study, research, and proof. Is there another theory that can be scientifically supported in a class room? Probably not. Given this fact, evolution should be taught, but the critique of it should be encouraged instead of prohibited. I do not believe science will ever prove beyond a shadow of a doubt how we came into being, because our origin is one of the mysteries set before us by God. I support all knowledge provided that knowledge is critiqued and examined with an open mind. Unfortunately, from my personal experience, most supporters of evolution do not encourage or want a true critical evaluation of evolution. This is where the science community fails to uphold its scientific creditials and where my problem with evolution begins. As for me, I will continue to study the developments in evolution and wait for my maker to tell me how I came into being when I meet Him face to face. Maybe I'll be surprised to find out the scientist had it right all along and maybe not. Personally, I believe God is so powerful we will be amazed to find out how he created us and the universe - probably in a manner that will suprise all of us.

How Southern am I?

Well, truth be told I'm
Dixie Royal
You are 87% true Southern!
You are pure belle or gentleman! You know your Jones Soda, Nehi and RC colas, your Moon Pies and sweet potato pie; you'd absolutely die without air conditioners in the summer, and you've seen Steel Magnolias and Fried Green Tomatoes (or read the book!). Your grandmother lives in an antebellum home and has a cook who makes the best fried chicken and asparagus casserole and summer squash and everything else in the world. And you know the taste of honeysuckle and the feel of grass between your toes.
You are blessed.



My test tracked 1 variable How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 99% on Southerliness
Link: The Southern-ness Test written by gwennykate on OkCupid Free Online Dating, home of the 32-Type Dating Test

Admin Update!

I have computer back! This weekend I hope work on a couple of big posts that I have been pondering over the past couple of weeks. I hope everyone had a great week and has a wonderful Memorial Day weekend.

On a side note, for those of you not in the 'know', Charleston is the place to be for the next three weeks if you have a serious interest in the arts and music. If you haven't guessed it already, Spoleto and Piccolo Spoleto run from today, May 26, through June 11. If you are in the area, don't forget to check out at least one performance.

23 May 2006

Blog Admin

I have been out of circulation this week, because my computer is in for diagnostic testing. As soon as my personal computer is returned to me I will return. I hope everyone is having a good week and had a wonderful weekend.

16 May 2006

A Conversion Story Worth Reading

I would like to point you to Gerald Augustine at The Cafeteria is Closed. I find his conversion story from JW - secular liberal - Catholic worth reading. Check it out here.

13 May 2006

Faith meets intellect

Is faith alone good enough? As scripture reminds us, Faith without works is dead. So, the answer is no. However, how far does a person dig into their faith? Many of us cannot defend the trinitarian teaching or other tenants of our faith although we profess them with clarity. Due to a couple of recent events, Fr. X declared apparently my faith is meeting my intellect. When he made this comment, I was floored. I never thought of myself as unintelligent and figured I was taking the faith part of my faith seriously instead of demanding to intellectually understand why I believe what I believe. I have been pondering this statement over the past few weeks and realize that my intellect craves a deeper knowledge of my faith although I have been focused on believing. I crave to understand Catholic theology, but realize I do not dig deep enough although I can answer a wide range of questions. So, where do I go now? Father looks forward to a growing intellectual grasp of my faith and the tension that exists between human understand and the mystical. Am I capable of this? Yes, my intellect isn't in question. For a long period of time I have been contemplating canon law and Catholic theology for graduate school - and even law school which Father points out is fully compatible with canon law as the CUA dual civil Law and Canon Law program proves.

Edited: June 14, 2006 PM

10 May 2006

Food for thought

God Calling
May 10
CALM - NOT SPEED
In quietness and in confidence shall be your strength. (Isa. 30:15)
All agitation is destructive of good. All calm is constructive of good, and at the same time destructive of evil.
When man wants evil destroyed so often he rushes to action. It is wrong. First be still and know that I am God. Then act only as I tell you. Always calm with God. Calm is trust in action. Only trust, perfect trust can keep one calm.
Never be afraid of any circumstances or difficulties that help you to cultivate this calm. As the world, to attain, has to learn speed, you, to attain, have to learn calm. All great work for Me is done first in the individual soul of the worker.

May 26, 2006: Update and Correction:

This is piece of inspiration i
s not my personal piece of work. This is from the book God Calling by Two Listeners. I originally noted the source of this piece, but when I edited the post removed the initial recognition. I apologize to any who took that as my personal claim to this writing.

Modern Ethical Questions

How will we determine who to vacinate for the Bird flu? The proposal put forward by at least two bioethicists should raise major alarms. This suggestion raises questions that could impact a variety of scenarios.

First Anniversary for Southern Catholic Convert

Today marks one year since setting up this blog. Although I considered closing this blog, I am glad I am blogging and look forward what the future holds. Later today, I will post a bit about why I blog and the future of this blog. Please let me know if you have any questions, suggestions or other input. Have a wonderful day and to all my fellow bloggers... keep blogging.

09 May 2006

Da Vinci Code 101

I love this 'catechism' for the Da Vinci Code complied by Fr. Wauck an American priest of the Opus Dei Prelature.

Hat tip to Steve at Southern Appeal

Interesting....

A woman can visually determine a man's paternal interest and testosterone levels or so they say. Not sure where I stand on this, but it is an interesting thought.

05 May 2006

One of these days

Many issues are looming in my mind this evening while many will be taking a couple of hours out of their schedule to take in Flight 93 and I obstinately refuse to watch the movie. Frankly, less than two minutes of the trailer left me in tears so I am not going to spend a Friday night shook up over an event I remember clearly. Although I was not in NY on 9/11, the horrific events of that day rocked my world to the core. As the day progressed, I remembered a conversation I had with my father about a month before 9/11 regarding the last attack on American soil - Pearl Harbor - and the feeling we were in for a rude awakening. I remember feeling like I was in a real life Tom Clancy novel and the knowledge our country would forever change due to the events of the day. In the aftermath of 9/11 I traveled to New York City to help with the efforts at ground zero and received the biggest shock of my life. Although I love to travel, I was home sick the entire time I was in New York and could not shake the feeling that enveloped me while at ground zero. To hear of the workers removing the remains of the 9/11 victims and see their faces as they spoke of the horrific events. To feel death in the air at ground zero and know the location will be the final resting-place for those murdered in a horrific attack on innocent American citizens and our guests. This attack was an atrocity in the worst sense, because soldiers were not the attacked. It could have been any of us killed in that attack, because our enemy killed people found guilty of being in America.

Yes, I am angered, appalled, and disgusted by the actions of those who kill the innocent in the name of God or Allah. Part of me wants to seek revenge and skin them alive, but I realize that revenge does not serve a purpose. If anything, the desire for revenge and the inability to forgive harms us as individuals and as a society more than it harms those guilty of the worst crimes. I speak as someone who has had to rebuild my life after being the victim of a violent crime less than two years after 9/11 so I speak with some surety in this area. I have heard we need to keep the anger alive in order to protect ourselves, but I do not agree that we need to keep the anger alive. We need to remember what happened and protect our country and ourselves fully, but we do not need to keep the anger alive in order to do this. Hard as it is to realize, forgiveness does not mean we approve of what happened. God forgives each of us of our sins, but we still have to suffer the consequences of our actions. Likewise with those vile enough to attack our country in this horrific manner, we can forgive them, but this does not mean we will let them get away with what they did to us. Unfortunately, letting go of the anger is a hard lesson to learn and anger is the easy way out for the most part. As long as we stay angry, we think we remain vigilant although we are actually destroying ourselves bit by bit and allowing our enemy to win. Christ commands us to love our enemies and forgive them, as we want to be forgiven which is often the hardest part of the gospel for us to adhere to although it is one of the most beneficial teachings. Christ gave us this command, because he realized the harsh truth of the matter -- anger, yes even justified anger, is detrimental to our spiritual wellbeing.

The immediate victims of 9/11 and their families are in my prayers along with our citizens and government while we navigate the difficult process of protecting our country while not allowing anger to consume us. Yes, the deaths of almost 3,000 INNOCENT human beings is horrific and should awaken in us the need to protect ourselves instead of turning a blind eye to those who want to harm us. Anger and retribution are not the solution though.

So, one of these days, I may go see Flight 93 just as one of these days I may go The Passion of Christ.

Edited: June 14, 2006 PM

04 May 2006

China's relationship with the Vatican take another blow

Due to the unapproved ordination of two Bishops by the Chinese controlled "Catholic Church," four priests were excommunicated. Frankly, I am glad the Vatican has spoken regarding this situation, because too many believe Rome has turned a blind eye to the disrespect displayed by the Chinese "Catholic Church". If one is going to be Catholic, one needs to follow the Church laws and teachings not try to create a nation-state controlled psuedo Church.

Vatican spokesman Joaquin Navarro-Valls cited Article 1382 of the Roman Catholic Church's canon law. That article states that "both the bishop who, without a pontifical mandate, consecrates a person a bishop, and the one who receives the consecration from him, incur a 'latae sententiae excommunication,'" which means they are automatically excommunicated.

"The criticism toward the Chinese side by the Vatican is groundless," that statement said. "We hope the Vatican can respect the will of Chinese church and the vast numbers of priests as well as its church members so as to create good atmosphere for the improvement of Sino-Vatican ties." Source

03 May 2006

Verdict Pending

Moussaoui's fate will be annouced at 4:30 EST today, May 3, 2006.

Let's hope the jury's thinking is along the same lines as the judge's.

Update 4:35 EST

NPR currently says it appears he will be sentenced to life in prison NOT the death penalty.

Update 4:40 EST

It has been confirmed by the AP, Moussaoui will not be sentenced to death! Praise God!

02 May 2006

SSPX remains at odds with Rome

In recent comments Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, SSPX 'bishop', attacked our Holy Father, his past writings, the Second Vatican Counsel, and communion with Rome.

the SSPX prelate charged that Introduction to Christianity, a book published by the future Pope in 1968 is "full of heresies." He said that the errors in the book included "the negation of the dogma of the Redemption."

Bishop Tissier de Mallerais said that he was disappointed with the leadership of Pope Benedict. "It has been year now, and he has done nothing!" he told The Remnant.

The bishop indicated his impatience with efforts to persuade traditionalist Catholics that the teachings of the Second Vatican Council should be interpreted in the light of Church tradition. "You cannot read Vatican II as a Catholic work," he insisted.

He also dismissed criticism that the SSPX is guilty of breaking communion within the Church hierarchy. "'Communion' is nothing; it is an invention of the Second Vatican Council," the bishop said. "'Communion' does not mean anything to me-- it is a slogan of the new Church." Source

Quote of the Day

There are more tears shed over answered prayers than over unanswered prayers.

Saint Teresa of Avila

Source